Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Mmoh vs Viktor Troicki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mmoh vs Troicki analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Mmoh vs Viktor Troicki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mmoh 1 - 0 Troicki
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mmoh has won 46.27% of points on their second serve, while Troicki has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mmoh, in recent form, has won 49.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Troicki has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.63% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mmoh has saved 59.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Troicki has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mmoh has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Troicki winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14). Troicki has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 188/ 118), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 182/ 152).
- Player level: In the last year, Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12), where as Troicki has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mmoh winning 1 times and Troicki being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mmoh winning 3 and Troicki winning 2. The last match between Mmoh and Troicki was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 09-02-2021, First, Hard with Michael Mmoh getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 3-6 7-6(3) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 4:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mmoh and Troicki have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mmoh winning 1 times and Troicki 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Mmoh winning 2, and Troicki 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mmoh has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.05 while Troicki has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mmoh has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Troicki has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mmoh has converted 43.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Troicki has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
114
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
12
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
58% (286-207)
Career Total W/L
58% (553-404)
40% (8-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,164,400
Career Prize Money
$4,901,733
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Viktor Troicki |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 30 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 16 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 4:6:0 | 4:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (122/184) | 69% (122/178) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (85/122) | 65% (79/122) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (25/62) | 57% (32/56) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 46% (6/13) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (67/178) | 40% (74/184) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 3-6 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats 
Michael Mmoh
Player
Viktor Troicki
66%
(
122 of
184)
1st Serve %
69%
(
122 of
178)
9
Aces
16
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
85 of
122)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
79 of
122)
40%
(
25 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
40%
(
74 of
184)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
67 of
178)
177
Total Points Won
185
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Viktor Troicki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (20/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (204/209) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.53 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 107 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.75 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (856/1312) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (607/856) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (211/456) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (47/107) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (473/1287) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Michael Mmoh
43%
(
34 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Viktor Troicki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Viktor Troicki
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
5
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Christopher Eubanks
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
54 of
76)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
108)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Viktor Troicki
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Lucas Pouille
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Viktor Troicki
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
77%
(
70 of
91)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Alastair Gray
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Viktor Troicki
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
45 of
56)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
22 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
108
|
0-6 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Mmoh Vs Troicki Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
